Compared with Custom-built software
Commissioning your own software is the only way to get an exact fit, and for a genuinely unusual process it can be the right call. The comparison worth making is not about the first version, it is about who maintains it in year three, when the tax slabs have changed twice.
Side by side
| What matters | With MjFour | Custom-built software |
|---|---|---|
| Fit on day one | Configured to how you work, within a shape we did not design around you. | Exactly what you asked for. |
| When the FBR slabs change | Dated statutory rules updated as part of the product, for every customer at once. | A change request, quoted and scheduled. |
| When the developer moves on | Support Monday to Saturday, 9am–6pm PKT, by phone, WhatsApp and email. | The person who understood the code is the continuity plan. |
| Adding a second branch or campus | Confirmed transfers, per-establishment statute, campus transfers that keep history. | Typically a rewrite of assumptions made when there was one location. |
| Cost shape | A subscription in rupees; improvements arrive without a quote. | A build cost, then a maintenance retainer, then a change request per statute update. |
| Being audited on the numbers | Overrides, adjustments and concessions attributable to a named user by default. | An audit trail exists if it was specified and paid for. |
When Custom-built software is the better choice
If your core process is genuinely unusual, a manufacturing flow, a licensing regime, a trade with its own rules, a bespoke build will fit where a product cannot, and you should commission one. Ask the harder question first, though: who maintains it, and what happens the month statute changes and that person is unavailable.
See all productsQuestions people ask before they buy
Twenty minutes, your own data, no slides.
Bring a month of your own sales, a payslip you argue about, or last term’s fee sheet. We will show you what it looks like in MjFour.